« Posts tagged Google

SMX Seattle, Google Caffeine, and the Future of Search

Oh Seattle, how I love thee. I recently attended SMX Advanced Seattle and have to say that, for the most part, I was very impressed with the conference and the speakers (I was appalled at the self-promotional presentation by MySpace’s Tony Adam). The first session had me wondering if I had entered a room full of SEO newbies, but that thought quickly dissolved as I attended later sessions. Although I consider myself an advanced SEO guy, I really didn’t expect to gain any tactical-related knowledge from the conference, but I was excited about picking up insights and thoughts about the future of search from industry heavyweights like Danny Sullivan, Bruce Clay, Rand Fishkin, and Matt Cutts. I did not come away empty-handed.

It just so happened that I was in a session with Matt Cutts on the panel the same day that Google announced the completion of its new Caffeine index. At the risk of sounding like a total geek, I was elated to be in the room to hear Matt Cutts make the announcement in person. So let’s take a look at what the future of search holds for internet users and SEOs.

Google Caffeine Index

Although the goal of SEO is to increase website exposure across the internet, search engine rankings are no longer a gauge of success. The issue of measuring rankings has been more and more at odds with the perceived goals of SEO and the “real” measurable results. Over the last year or so, several factors have made the measurement of search engine rankings more difficult. When Google introduced personalized search, many people claimed the death of SEO. Nothing could be further from the truth. If anything, these innovations have helped to eliminate fraudulent SEOs. Since personalized search was implemented, users in different cities could simultaneously search for the exact same keyword or phrase and receive different results. Thus, measuring search engine rankings becomes more difficult, if not totally irrelevant. It gets better. With Google Caffeine, the indexing of websites will become much quicker and create a better user experience. More than ever, websites will be rewarded for updating content on a regular basis. I believe that Caffeine is a major advantage to search professionals who are able to monitor and gauge the result of updates with the speed of the new Caffeine index.

The future of search puts an even more complicated spin on SEO with behavioral, intent-based, and location-based search. These factors will result in even more differentiation of search engine results. Even if you are not signed into your Google account, don’t think for a minute that your internet actions are not being monitored and logged by Google. The privacy implications involved are another discussion all together. Why would search engines want all this data? They want to provide more relevant and valuable material to the user. Local search will become even more imperative to monitor in the coming years. Bruce Clay suggested that 50% of all searches in two years will be localized search. The inclusion of real-time social Twitter and Facebook data in search engine results adds another element to the picture and one that cannot be ignored. I have harped on the necessity of social media marketing quite a bit, so I won’t stray from my discussion regarding SEO, but I thought I would just throw the social thing into the mix. Why not? It will play a huge role in building brand awareness, increasing consumer engagement, and reputation management.

So what is a good measurement of SEO success? How about traffic and revenue? In reality, these two factors have been the only real measure of success all along. Even in the past, having a website rank number one in Google was only a benefit if the website provided a good user experience. If a user clicked on top-ranked listing only to have difficulty navigating and finding the information he/she was seeking, the ranking became moot at that point. I have been preaching the importance of user experience when it comes to SEO for years. Thankfully, search engine engineers understand this need and are continually working to make sites with relevant material and greater usability rank higher in the results.

The future of search marketing creates new challenges and opportunities for search marketers. It will be an interesting ride.

Thoughts on Privacy: Google, Foursquare, Facebook

Online privacy is a major issue in the social media landscape these days. What we have witnessed in the past few months has brought the privacy issue to the forefront. I suppose it all started with Google’s implementation of personalized search in 2009. Even though Google had been monitoring and compiling user behavior for quite some time, personalized search raised red flags for many Google users. In reality, the results we receive from personalized search are not so different. As long as the information is not sold to third parties, I am all for receiving more relevant search engine results.

The launch and privacy issue with Google Buzz deserves a blog post of its own, so I won’t even go there now.

Foursquare is another application that raises the same types of concerns but at a much more “local” level. Websites, such as PleaseRobMe.com scared many would potential users away from Foursquare. The PleaseRobMe website garnered so much attention and a strong response from Foursquare that it no longer publishes its list of vacant homes.

Foursquare has become a phenomenon. Its user count hit the one million mark in just one year, while it took Twitter 2 years to reach the same level (though Twitter now has over 100 million worldwide users). I must admit that I was a hold out early on when it came to Foursquare, as I recently mentioned in a blog post compiled by fellow team leads of AREA203‘s new media team. Since then, I have become an avid user and see the huge potential for brick and mortar businesses that choose to participate with Foursquare. The recent announcement regarding Pennsylvania’s partnership with Foursquare is a perfect example of the advantages provided by Foursquare. As an early hold out myself, I do understand the concerns of people worried about the location-based information published on Foursquare. A word of advice: just like Facebook, I suggest only “friending” people on Foursquare whom you know or converse with in the social realm. Just be smart about it.

Alas, the big daddy of privacy concerns today is most definitely Facebook. Facebook’s privacy changes created a mass backlash from the Facebook user community, so much so that Facebook was forced to make changes to the usability of the privacy settings platform. Facebook founder, Mark Zuckerberg released a video on May 26 describing these changes:

Personally, I understand why Facebook would want its user community to be more public (which is a direct reaction to the explosive growth and public nature of Twitter), but I do believe the backlash could have been avoided had Facebook taken a more proactive approach by announcing and clearly defining the changes before they were launched. For me, Facebook is a tool for me to interact with a small group of close friends. For that reason, any information I post on Facebook is visible only to my friend list and no one else.

With the privacy issue so prevalent now, I would love to hear what your thoughts are.